Back to Robotics & Automation
Robotics & Automation·Security & Protection Services

KSCP

Knightscope, Inc.
Rating
REDUCE
Target Price
$1.50
Upside
-16.7%
Horizon
6-12 months

Thesis. Knightscope delivered a genuine inflection — Q1 2026 revenue of $6.0M (+106% YoY, +137% QoQ) and its first positive quarterly gross profit — yet operating losses of $10.3M against $11.4M total cash leave the balance sheet roughly one quarter from a raise. With shares at $1.80 near the 52-week low and management issuing large equity awards, the setup rewards patience over capitulation into the 696% consensus fantasy target set by just three analysts.

Scoreboard

Last Close
$1.80
-5.26% d/d
Target
$1.50
Market Cap
$31.1M
52-Week Range
$1.76 – $10.14

KSCP trades at $1.80, down 82% from its $10.14 52-week high and just 2.3% above the $1.76 low, pinning it at the 0.5-percentile of its annual range with a $31M market cap and $27.5M enterprise value. The 3-analyst mean target of $14.33 implies a mathematically absurd 696% upside — a figure disconnected from the $10M quarterly cash burn and imminent dilution. Price sits well below both the 50-day ($2.54) and 200-day ($4.02) averages, confirming a broken tape.

QoQ Changes

Revenue & EPS

Q1 2026 revenue surged to $6.016M from $2.538M in Q4 2025 — a 137% sequential jump that beat the $3.65M estimate by 131%, though EPS of -$0.74 missed the -$0.55 consensus by 36%. The revenue beat is real, but the EPS miss underscores that scale has not yet touched the cost structure.

Margins

Gross profit turned positive at $465K (7.7% margin) versus -$1.62M in Q4 2025 — the first positive gross print in the visible series after four negative quarters. Operating margin remains deeply underwater at -155% and EBITDA margin at -233%, so the gross-line inflection has not reached operating leverage.

Cash Flow

FCF margin runs at -137% and FCF yield at -64%, signaling cash consumption roughly equal to revenue. Operating losses of ~$10.3M per quarter dwarf the $11.4M cash balance, making external financing a when-not-if question.

Balance Sheet

Total cash of $11.4M ($0.66/share) against $7.89M debt yields net cash of $3.51M, with current ratio 1.51 and quick ratio 1.20 providing near-term but not durable liquidity. Debt-to-equity of 23.2x looks alarming on a depleted equity base, though the absolute debt load is modest.

Valuation

Shares trade at 2.15x sales and 0.86x book ($2.09 book value) — below book but justified given negative returns (ROE -143%, ROA -51%). EV/revenue of 1.9x is unremarkable for a sub-scale hardware-services name still posting negative EBITDA (EV/EBITDA -0.82x).

Strategic Actions

The May contract announcement of ~$3.8M in new and recurring bookings across eight verticals and a Carnegie Mellon collaboration signal commercial traction and an autonomy roadmap. On the capital side, June 2026 Form 4 filings show only compensation awards (code A) to the CEO, CFO, and executives — no open-market purchases — a neutral-to-dilutive signal.

Ownership & Insider Activity

Institutional
9.3%
Insider
10.3%
Short Interest
16.7%
Dark Pool
n/a

Finnhub SEC Form 4 data shows the entire recent insider footprint is compensation grants dated 2026-06-04 — CEO William Li received 1,243,116 shares, CFO Apoorv Dwivedi 710,352, and Soria/Lehnhardt 355,176 each, all at $0 cost (code A) with zero open-market purchases. That is dilution and pay, not conviction buying. Short interest at 16.68% of float (2.82M shares, up from 2.57M prior month) with a 4.73-day cover ratio confirms an active bear thesis around the burn-and-raise dynamic.

Recent Insider Transactions

No recent insider transactions on file.

Earnings Quality

Beat Rate
25%
Avg Surprise
-11.81%
Beats
1
Misses
3
PeriodActual EPSEstimateSurpriseSurprise %
2026-03-31 Q1$-0.74$-0.55$-0.19-35.61%
2025-12-31 Q4$-0.92$-0.77$-0.15-20.26%
2025-09-30 Q3$-0.98$-0.83$-0.15-17.65%
2025-06-30 Q2$-0.90$-1.22+$0.32+26.27%

KSCP beat EPS in only 1 of the last 4 quarters (25%) with an average surprise of -11.8%, missing by 36% in the most recent quarter — a pattern of persistent negative surprises that signals analyst models still overestimate cost discipline.

Surprises have re-widened after a Q2 2025 beat (+26%), swinging back to -18%, -20%, and -36% — a deteriorating trend that points to loss estimates chasing a cost base that keeps outrunning them.

Analyst Action

MonthDistributionStrong BuyBuyHoldSellStrong Sell
2026-07
26100
2026-06
26100
2026-05
26100
2026-04
26100

The Finnhub recommendation series is frozen at 2 Strong Buy / 6 Buy / 1 Hold / 0 Sell across all four months (Apr–Jul 2026), showing zero rating migration and no fresh conviction either way. The bullish tilt is stale, not building.

Momentum is flat-bullish on paper but effectively inert — no upgrades or downgrades in 15 days and no drift, so the ratings offer no forward signal.

Seven Essential Metrics

Profitability
Weak

EBITDA margin -233%, profit margin -258%, ROE -143% — deeply unprofitable at every line.

Growth
Strong

Revenue +106% YoY and +137% QoQ to $6.0M, the clear bright spot in the story.

Cash Flow
Weak

FCF margin -137% and FCF yield -64%, burning roughly one dollar per revenue dollar.

Leverage
Moderate

Net cash of $3.51M cushions modest $7.89M debt, but 23.2x debt/equity flags a thin equity base.

Risk
High

~$10M quarterly burn versus $11.4M cash plus beta 1.30 imply acute financing and going-concern risk.

Valuation
Fair

0.86x book and 2.15x sales look cheap, but negative fwd P/E (-0.83x) and EV/EBITDA (-0.82x) reflect no earnings to anchor to.

Shareholder
Dilutive

Multi-million-share June awards plus an inevitable capital raise point to sustained dilution, not returns.

Income
Growth focused, no dividend

No dividend; all capital is consumed funding operating losses.

Competitive Snapshot

CompanyEBITDA Margin3Y Rev CAGRFCF MarginLeverageFwd P/E
AXON
Axon Enterprise
~24%~30%~20%Net cash~75x
EVLV
Evolv Technologies
~0-5%~35%~-5%Net cashn/a
ONDS
Ondas Holdings
negative~20%negative<1xn/a
IRBT
iRobot
negative~-10%negativeHighn/a

Against Axon — the security-tech gold standard with ~24% EBITDA margins and net cash — Knightscope is a pre-scale science project trading on hope rather than economics. Its closest analogs are cash-burning small caps like Evolv and Ondas, where 100%+ revenue growth is the entire investment case and profitability remains a distant abstraction. On P/S (2.15x) KSCP screens cheaper than Axon, but that discount is fully earned by negative gross margins and a fragile balance sheet.

Business & Strategy

Revenue Mix

Revenue centers on Autonomous Security Robots (K5 Outdoor, K1 Hemisphere) sold as a recurring managed service, supplemented by emergency communications hardware (K1 Blue Light Towers, E-Phones, Call Boxes) and the KSOC/KEMS software layers. The recent $3.8M booking spanned eight verticals — critical infrastructure, healthcare, retail, higher education, gaming — indicating diversification beyond corporate campuses.

Customers

A fragmented base across corporate, government, education, and commercial real estate clients with no disclosed concentration in the provided data.

Revenue Streams

The model blends recurring machine-as-a-service (RMR) subscriptions for robots with hardware sales of emergency-communication devices and SaaS monitoring fees. Recurring revenue mix is the key metric to watch for durability.

Cost Drivers

Hardware BOM, robot deployment/servicing labor, and R&D dominate costs, keeping gross margins near breakeven despite scaling revenue.

Knightscope owns a first-mover brand in a nascent 'Autonomous Security Force' category with a growing installed base and switching costs once robots are embedded in client operations. But the moat is shallow — capital-intensive hardware, unproven unit economics, and well-funded adjacent competitors (Axon, drone/robotics entrants) can encroach quickly.

Monetary-Policy Sensitivity

Scenario
-50 bp cut
Estimated intrinsic-value uplift
+10% to +20%
Drivers
  • Small-cap/high-beta duration sensitivity to discount rates
  • Cheaper access to dilutive equity/debt financing
  • Risk-on rotation into speculative AI-robotics names

As an unprofitable, cash-burning microcap, KSCP is acutely sensitive to liquidity conditions — a dovish pivot lowers its cost of capital and eases the terms of the raise it will need. Conversely, the June 2026 strong-jobs print that pushed the industrial complex lower shows how quickly rate-cut disappointment punishes names like this.

SWOT Analysis

Strengths
  • Revenue +106% YoY with first positive quarterly gross profit ($465K)
  • Recognized first-mover brand in autonomous security robotics
  • Recurring managed-service model with growing multi-vertical bookings
  • Net cash position ($3.51M) and Carnegie Mellon autonomy partnership
Weaknesses
  • ~$10.3M quarterly operating loss versus only $11.4M cash
  • Deeply negative margins (EBITDA -233%, profit -258%)
  • Persistent EPS misses (1 of 4 beats, avg -11.8% surprise)
  • Ongoing insider-award dilution and thin institutional ownership (9.3%)
Opportunities
  • Scaling recurring revenue toward operating leverage and positive gross margins
  • Expansion across eight-plus new verticals from recent contract wins
  • Secular tailwind in labor-scarce physical security and automation
  • Government/critical-infrastructure adoption of ASR platforms
Threats
  • Near-certain dilutive capital raise at depressed prices
  • 16.68% short interest signaling active bear pressure
  • Well-capitalized competitors (Axon, drone/robotics entrants)
  • Nasdaq listing/going-concern risk if burn is not curbed

Catalysts & Event Risks

  1. Q2 2026
    Q2 FY2026 earnings

    Next print will test whether the Q1 revenue jump and gross-margin inflection are durable or one-off.

  2. Q3 2026
    Capital raise / financing event

    With cash roughly one quarter of burn, an equity or debt raise is the dominant near-term overhang.

  3. Q3 2026
    New contract announcements

    Additional multi-vertical bookings would extend the top-line momentum narrative that supports the bulls.

  4. Q4 2026
    Carnegie Mellon autonomy milestones

    Deliverables from the university collaboration could reframe the technology moat.

  5. 2026-09-30
    Fed rate decision

    A dovish move would materially ease KSCP's cost of capital ahead of its financing need.

The single most important catalyst is the terms and timing of the inevitable capital raise — everything else is secondary to whether shareholders are diluted at $1.80 or an even lower print. Continued contract momentum can cushion sentiment, but it cannot outrun the cash math.

Technical Analysis

52-Week Price Action
Downtrend
Support: $1.76Resistance: $2.54
2025-07-13Low $1.80High $10.092026-07-12

KSCP is in a pronounced downtrend, sitting at $1.80 — a mere 2.3% above its $1.76 52-week low and 82% below the $10.14 high, at the 0.5-percentile of its annual range. Price is stacked below the 50-day ($2.54) and 200-day ($4.02) moving averages, both of which now act as overhead resistance. The 52-week low at $1.76 is the last technical floor; a decisive break there — plausible on a dilutive raise — opens air beneath the stock. Risk-reward favors waiting for either a confirmed base above the 50-day or a capitulation flush, not catching this falling knife.

Verdict

Macro context. The industrial/robotics complex sold off in June 2026 as strong US jobs data dampened rate-cut hopes, a backdrop that disproportionately pressures unprofitable, financing-dependent microcaps. Structural tailwinds in labor-scarce physical security remain intact, but capital-markets access — not end-demand — is the binding constraint for KSCP.

Knightscope has genuinely inflected on the top line — 106% revenue growth and a first positive gross profit are not nothing — but the investment case collapses on the balance sheet, where a ~$10M quarterly operating loss against $11.4M of cash makes a dilutive raise a near-mathematical certainty within one to two quarters. With insiders taking awards rather than buying, 16.68% short interest, and a 696% consensus target that reflects three analysts' imagination more than KSCP's cash reality, the prudent stance is to REDUCE into strength and revisit only after the financing overhang clears and gross margins prove durable. Target $1.50, ~17% downside.


Data source: Yahoo Finance / yfinance · fetched 7/8/2026, 9:51:24 AM